Saturday, May 25, 2019

Arius the Heretic


Arius the Heretic

One of the intellectual centers of early Christianity, after its legitimization by the Roman Emperor Constantine, was the city of Alexandria, Egypt.  He was well-respected for his intellect and his scholarly abilities.  After hearing a long sermon by a young scholar named Athanasius on the subject of the Trinity, Arius interrupted and announced, “If the Father begat the Son, then He who was begotten had a beginning in existence, and from this it follows that there was a time when the Son was not.”

The debate: was Jesus a created being, or does the New Testament teach that He is co-equal with God.  In one sense, the argument is over a single Greek letter, the iota.  Simply put, does the term homo-ousios (exact same ‘stuff’) or does the term homoi-ousious (close to, but not exactly the same ‘stuff’) apply to Jesus’ relation to the Father.

We understand today that Arius was completely in the wrong, Biblically.  In the fourth century, though, with the spectre of persecution finally being lifted from the church, these doctrines were still in the process of being defined and this was a foundational debate that was sorely needed.  The central issue to Athanasius was salvation itself.  If only God could save us from sin, then only one who was fully God could pay the price required for our sins.

As the debate spread, Emperor Constantine, very concerned for the peace of his Empire, called a council in the city of Nicea in the year 325 to resolve the issue.  Over 300 bishops attended to come to a resolution on this vital doctrinal issue.  The aged Arius had a number of followers supporting him, but they were overwhelmed by the brilliant debating skills of Athanasius – not to mention that the latter had truth on his side!  At Nicea, the doctrines of Arius were refuted in their finality and Arius was exiled.  All but a couple of the bishops in attendance at Nicea signed on to the final agreement of the doctrine of the Trinity.

It is interesting to note that, at one point in the deliberations, a bishop from the city of Myra named Nicholas, actually got so flustered that he actually punched Arius in the face!  Nicholas is “Saint Nicholas” – the man from whom the legends of Santa Claus had their genesis.

The teaching of Arianism plagued the church for the next few centuries, even reaching to future emperors of the Roman empire.  It took the fall of the Roman Empire and the ascendance of the Roman Catholic Church to squash the false doctrine with a finality.  Today, cults such as Jehovah’s Witnesses point to Arius as an ‘early church father’ who taught what they believe – that Jesus was a created being and is lesser than God the Father.

131 Christians Everyone Should Know, J.I. Packer, Holman Reference, 2000.



Saturday, May 18, 2019

Marcion - Early Church Heretic


Marcion

Heresy in the early church led to the church having to examine its crucial teachings and provide definition to its basic doctrines.  One such teacher was Marcion (ca. 85-160 AD).  Marcion was independently wealthy and gave 2,000 silver coins to the church in Rome, apparently in an attempt to buy some influence within the church.  His unique doctrines and attempts to change the teachings of the church compelled the church to return his sizeable donation and excommunicate him.

We do not have today the direct writings of Marcion.  What we know about Marcion comes from some writings of the early church fathers, especially Tertullian who wrote a treatise entitled “Against Marcion.”  From these rebuttals, historians have pieced together the doctrines of Marcionism.

Marcion believed and taught that the God of the Old Testament (Yahweh) was incompatible with the God of the New Testament.  He believed that the God taught by the Old Testament was on a higher, somewhat transcendent level and that Jesus in the New Testament was a lower world creator and ruler.  What he accepted of the Old Testament, he read very literally to prove his point.  As an example, when he read in Genesis of God walking through the Garden of Eden asking where Adam was, that proved to him that Yahweh had a physical body and had limited knowledge.  The God of the Old Testament was angry, capricious, genocidal.  The God of the New Testament (as he edited the books) was loving, benevolent, and merciful.  To Marcion, these two ‘gods’ were incompatible with each other.  Jesus was sent to reveal the merciful New Testament God. 

Marcion also taught that Jesus had only an imitation of a physical body, and thus denied Jesus’ physical birth, life, death, burial, and resurrection.  Jesus was crucified because of his opposition to Yahweh, but he wasn’t really harmed because he did not actually have a physical body (a teaching of the Gnostics of his day).

To support his views, Marcion instituted a canon – an authoritative list of books he deemed proper.  These books numbered eleven: a highly edited version of the Gospel of Luke (removing His birth account, for example) and ten of Paul’s epistles (removing the Pastoral Epistles).  To Marcion, Paul was the only apostle not corrupted in his teaching.

Marcion’s heresy was actually beneficial to the church in the long term.  The development of a specific set of books by Marcion was the impetus for the early church to come to an understanding of what books were authoritative as Scripture.  While this essay does not purport to examine precisely how that happened, it can be summed up by saying that God miraculously moved in the early church to bring them to consensus on the 27 books of the New Testament as currently stated.  At the time of the early church father Athanasius (AD 367), there was no dispute as to the canon of the New Testament.

The early church developed the Apostles’ Creed in response to heretics, including Marcion, to succinctly state basic Christian doctrine.

Moody Handbook of Theology, Paul Enns, Moody Bible Institute, 1989.